carly foulkes

carly foulkes. carly foulkes wiki.
  • carly foulkes wiki.



  • ivladster
    Mar 28, 04:20 PM
    Welcome to 1984.

    You know there are plenty of other platforms and OS, so no it's not 1984, it's 2011!





    carly foulkes. ChaCha Answer: Carly Foulkes
  • ChaCha Answer: Carly Foulkes



  • miles01110
    Sep 12, 08:23 AM
    Is there going ot be an IRC feed like WWDC? If so what is the channel/port? Sorry to ask here, but I couldn't find the info on the main page...





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes wiki. sexiest
  • carly foulkes wiki. sexiest



  • prady16
    Oct 19, 09:53 AM
    Always a good sign!





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes
  • Carly Foulkes



  • steviem
    Apr 26, 08:40 AM
    People can be so disgusting. Seriously, how would it have hurt those girls in her using a stall? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't hurt a guy if she went into the Men's bathroom to use a stall.

    The poor girl was a waif too. What could she have done to those girls?

    Whilst the company shouldn't say 'if you see any fights, jump in the middle of them', those employees should know full well that it isn't ok to watch and laugh as someone is getting the tish kicked out of them! Who was the man in the Blue shirt at the start of the video? he tried to break it up at first but seemed to then let it carry on.





    carly foulkes. model Carly Foulkes from
  • model Carly Foulkes from



  • Northgrove
    May 3, 02:31 PM
    Here's my take on it.

    One of the carriers source of income is data charges. Within that category of data sales is:

    1) Data used via smartphone for web access.
    2) Data used via tethering your phone & laptop.
    3) Data used via a laptop air card bought from the carrier.

    When you use method 2 illegally, the carrier loses out on that data sale. It's been like this for years, yet not been a problem as large as it is now.

    Yes, hmm, I think where this arguments ends is that they have set their prices so that they don't actually make a profit from their data charges alone, and need to somehow "compensate" for this by creating artificial fees. I guess the fierce competition drives them there. What I'm saying is just that I think charging for the way you use data isn't very logical, but charging for how much data you use is. Hm, if that made any sense. :)





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes. model named
  • carly foulkes. model named



  • Erasmus
    Jan 5, 06:05 PM
    Awesome!

    Thanks Arn! You're a true legend.

    In terms of not being able to wait, you should come live in Australia. Considering the Keynote is at like 4:00 am or something, I'll be able to get the stream when I wake up!

    I think I'm going to enjoy Wednesday Morning...





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes model photos.
  • carly foulkes model photos.



  • zim
    Nov 23, 05:52 PM
    Hmm. Anyone think that there's a chance of a price drop on the Airport Express?

    I got mine last Back Friday and it was discounted.. so maybe.





    carly foulkes. Posts: 6393
  • Posts: 6393



  • ezekielrage_99
    Jan 14, 11:26 PM
    I think they'll be barred after this....

    http://gizmodo.com/344673/do-you-really-think-the-macworld-keynotes-leaked-on-wikipedia





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes pics.
  • carly foulkes pics.



  • DTphonehome
    Oct 17, 09:52 AM
    I do , I have 140Gb of Photos from my DSLR (and previous digital cameras) putting this on 3 discs rather than 40 discs would be great

    I also have 28Gb of music, backing up form itunes to 1 disc rather than 8 would also be useful

    So why not just use an external HD?





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes Model.
  • Carly Foulkes Model.



  • RichardBeer
    Mar 24, 03:17 PM
    Awesome! Happy Birthday Apple Macintosh Operating System 10! <333





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes t-mobile.
  • carly foulkes t-mobile.



  • albusseverus
    Jan 10, 05:41 PM
    just goes to show, if your name is Think Secret and you have no corporate backing, Apple will hound you out of existence...

    if you publish an unchecked story about the iPhone being delayed, causing a run on Apple's stock price...

    or stuff up a trade show...

    it's all just good fun... ??

    it's hard to know the best way to treat this... ban them and give them MORE publicity? or boycott their site...

    Kevin, can we have a negative Digg option... I want UnDigg





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes
  • Carly Foulkes



  • roadbloc
    Apr 8, 11:58 AM
    You can say that about any consumer product.
    Speaking in general terms, MS has added more to windows, improved performance and reduced the bloat with win7.

    Apple has gone the opposite direction, adding bloat and no major feature since 10.5

    +1. Hopefully Lion will be worth the added system requirements.

    Anyways, he features I've heard that are to new to Windows 8 so far is:





    carly foulkes. If Sprint hasn#39;t already
  • If Sprint hasn#39;t already



  • MattyMac
    Sep 12, 07:36 AM
    Oh man Oh man Oh man





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes spicing
  • Carly Foulkes spicing



  • TheSideshow
    Apr 21, 09:52 AM
    Its gunna be awesome. Im hoping for a Metro UI to surface.





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes, in a .
  • Carly Foulkes, in a .



  • KnightWRX
    Mar 13, 12:32 PM
    For me, I do see the iPad (and actually the App Store) as a change in computing. By removing the complex processes that we go through in a computer (eg instead of downloading an app, moving it into a folder, deleting the dmg its a simple case of downloading the app), the iPad is changing our computer experience by simplifying it to the extent that it's only the part we want to use rather than need to use.

    But that is not redefining "Computing" or computers at all. It's simply making them easier to use. If you want it to absolutely be about redefining something, talk about usability, not computing.

    The iPad is still receiving network/USB input for that app, processing the data and eventually storing it. It is still doing the very same concept of computing we were doing 50 years ago on massive mainframes. There is no shift in "computing".

    You again failed to address this point in your quest to see redefinition where there is none. You're thinking at way to precise of a level to even talk about computers/computing.

    The iPad and the App Store process have the potential to kickstart and similarly drastic change in computing as moving from a line based OS to a GUI.

    Again, no change in "Computing" there. You're talking about usability once again. Line based or GUI based, it was all about taking input, processing it, storing the resulting data or outputting it. Be it with printf() statements or XCreateWindow() and then drawing to it.

    The concept of computing is the same in both line based or GUI based interface. The output mechanism is different, the input device is different.

    In this case, "input is not input": a GUI opened up computers to more than just programmers

    You have not proven your hypothesis of "input is not input". It very much is. Clicking and typing are both types of input. I challenge you to prove otherwise.

    but increasingly I think the computer is moving away from the idea of a desktop PC.

    The computer has never been so intimate with Desktop PCs. Every desktop PC is a computer, not every computer is a desktop PC. Again, last 50 years of computing has seen tremendous boost in computer usage in about everything. The desktop PC has been one small segment of computer usage and of the very large computing industry. Embedded systems is another. Mainframe systems are still very much alive. Thin client computing is an idea of the 70s that saw a come back in the 90s with Sun's push ("The network is the computer"). Today, it's all about "mobile" devices, which are a type of embedded system.

    I think you're just very ignorant (not meant as an insult, just a casual observation based on your replies) of what computing and computers actually are that you see a "new segment" as a massive paradigm shift. There is no shift. Again :

    Input. Process. Output. Store.

    There is no more to it than that and until you change this very simple definition, you have not shifted any paradigms in computing.





    carly foulkes. carly-foulkes-3.jpg]
  • carly-foulkes-3.jpg]



  • roadbloc
    Mar 14, 04:23 AM
    Wait a while.
    I'm still waiting for Laptops to kill Desktops like everyone said they were going to in the early 2000's.

    iPads will sell. So will Laptops. So will Desktops. So will Servers. The iPad will not, and simply cannot replace them all. It's impossible.





    carly foulkes. Carly Foulkes is sexy she the
  • Carly Foulkes is sexy she the



  • Menge
    Apr 21, 10:43 AM
    Good feature! The look doesn't match much of the rest of the forum theme, though.

    Quick edit: what now? Can we filter a thread for only positive posts? Only posts above N points? Can we search for posts above a certain rating?





    carly foulkes. girl (Carly Foulkes).
  • girl (Carly Foulkes).



  • mwswami
    Aug 7, 06:37 PM
    Makes them a little more attractive to the penny concious buyer.

    More importantly, cutting price of the current design signals the arrival of a new design in the not-too-distant-future.

    No IR sensor on Mac Pro seems to suggest that as well.





    carly foulkes. carly foulkes.
  • carly foulkes.



  • Illuminated
    Apr 6, 12:48 PM
    You'd pair food with a trash can? :confused:

    Maybe for you...

    http://thedecorologist.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/toilet-coffee-mug-via-harrietcarter.jpg

    Um, a brand new trash can. Plus you would have to burn inside of the trashcan first...pretty much build a fire inside it using coals and wood.





    Mad Mac Maniac
    Apr 21, 01:53 PM
    Very true. At the same time I will read and form an opinion of the topic all on my own. I'm sure I'm not alone there, but then again I am sure many will take the popular vote route and just form their opinion based on that. Either way, a post that is good for you and me may not be good for others. I've had a fair share of PMs about my posts, both in support of and against. It is all subjective, as you say, and this rating system will be similar.

    well sometimes there is an article about different kind of processor, chips or whatever. some stuff that I don't know anything about. So then I like to look at the votes and see if this is something that is good or bad for Apple. I like to think that majority of the people voting have the same love of apple products and have more insight on this issue than I do.





    Uragon
    Nov 17, 11:23 AM
    I think Digitimes always comes out with an exaggerated news to cover-up for something new....ahem.. that is completely different





    Glideslope
    Apr 25, 01:23 PM
    Why are you so adamant that they will use 4S instead of 5?

    -The 3GS had an identical appearance to the 3G, but with upgraded internals, hence the S.
    -A 3.7" iPhone would not have an identical appearance to the iPhone 4 by virtue of the screen size alone, so there would be no reason to simply add an S.
    -3G is a feature description, adding an S might make some sense there as it could also be considered a "feature description". 4 is a revision number, why would they add an S to that? 4.5 or 5 would make more sense.
    -The iPhone 4 and iOS 4 were launched in the same time frame, it makes sense for the numbers on each to match up. What's next? iPhone 5 and iOS 5 of course. I don't know why they'd stray from matching revision numbers so quickly after finally achieving them.
    -If they plan on calling the phone after this 6, why would they skip 5, which sounds like a bigger upgrade than 4S?

    As far as I'm concerned, 4S is the least likely name possible for the next iPhone. iPhone 5, 4G (LTE), 4.5 (very unlikely), and plain "iPhone" all have a much greater chance than 4S (with 5 being the most likely). I just spent way to much time on this minor issue though.

    The phone will be the 4s. The start of production of the CDMA phone in Aug 2010 threw everything off kilter.

    The 4s will be a 4 with the 3.7 screen, and a A5 chip. That is it. Period.

    The 5 will be out in 2012 with Qualcomms 2nd gen Dual Band Chip which will be ready early 2012. It will will be a complete redesign with LTE. My money is on some type of new chassis with a new hybrid aluminum. The back glass will be gone for sure.

    Apple will then produce 1 World iPhone. 5,6,7,8,9.... all Global Phones. :apple:





    Anuba
    Jan 12, 05:44 PM
    Someone asked you what you were hoping for, and that's it? You call it not revolutionary, but you can't give a single idea of what you think revolutionary is? :confused:
    Ideally, a revolutionary product is a completely new concept, something nobody thought of before. If all the iPhone mockups out there had missed the mark, the iPhone would be revolutionary, but there were quite a few that were based on the idea of a huge display and no keys. The iPhone is a mishmash of existing concepts that have been refined, polished and rolled into one. While the multi-touch screen is a milestone of sorts, other aspects of the iPhone are very yesterday. The modest memory, for one, and for another the absence of 3G which is somewhat of a shocker - 3G has been a staple of top-of-the-line phones for years now.

    Did I miss the part of the keynote where Steve said this was aimed at the business market? :eek:
    If not the business market, then who? It can't be kids, as it has no games, and allegedly no support for custom ringtones. It can't be business users, since they'll want Outlook or Lotus Notes sync, and possibly a navigator, and they'll most definitely not want to use frickin' iTunes to sync up. Which leaves, I dunno... Mac enthusiasts and 30-somethings who are hoping for 15 minutes of fame by the watercooler? He did say his goal was 10 million units.





    Schmye Bubbula
    Mar 25, 12:57 PM
    I don't think I've ever seen such a consistent troll on any forum."Consistent" is an understatement.If you think that John Siracusa (or citations thereto) is a troll, then your ignorance is breathtaking. (The absence of your actually addressing the issue at hand in lieu of ad hominem attacks is conspicuous and dubious.)



    Total Pageviews